When I was a young kid (4-10), I wanted to be an astronaut.
Then, suddenly, my ‘dream’ changed – I started telling people that I wanted to
be a lawyer. I always thought that the reason for this change was that my dad
always said that being a lawyer was a good career, but going through old papers
while I was at home made me realize maybe this wasn’t the whole story.
I found a “newspaper” that I had written in fourth grade.
Our class had a variety of student-run “businesses”: some people made crafts
out of paper and traded them for rocks others collected on the playground. To
be a part of this economy, I wrote a sporadic “newspaper,” proudly typed up in
Microsoft Publisher and printed on long paper (to be more authentic), which I
traded to get my share of rocks and paper bracelets. The teacher tried to stop
us, as we used a lot of classroom supplies, but, I digress…
One of these “newspaper” “issues” contained a story about
the space shuttle Challenger and its 1986 explosion. Reading it now, I am
brought back memories of how shocked I was when I discovered that this had
happened, that seven people had died. Even though I was reading about it
fourteen years after the fact, I felt as if those people had just died. With my
father away in Afghanistan, I was profoundly struck by the mortality of these
people I saw as heroes (no doubt there was a fearful analogy in my fourth-grade
mind to my father, who I also saw as my hero).
I am reminded of this shred of my past by the resoundingly
successful landing of Curiosity on Mars, an emotional event I watched while
observing at Palomar Observatory. Early in the evening on the day of the
scheduled landing I excitedly texted my uncle, whose ten-year-old son has
repeatedly told me that he wants to go to Caltech someday, to let him know
about the landing.
After the message was sent, however, I worried, perhaps
irrationally, about what would happen if Curiosity were to crash to the surface
in a fiery mess instead of land as it was supposed to. Would my cousin lose
faith in Caltech? NASA? Science? I remembered all too clearly my own first
impression of science’s imperfections, and I was worried that were Curiosity to
fail, it would have some momentous effect on my cousin’s life plans.
My fears were unfounded. Curiosity landed on the surface of
Mars safely, and as I watched the jubilant celebration of the involved
scientists and engineers on a laptop, in the data room of the Hale 200-inch, I
imagined my cousin watching this celebration and how much this success would
inspire him. I imagined him tracking the progress of the MSL over the next
weeks, months, or even years as I voraciously consumed everything I could about
Voyager when I learned about it as a child. I was fascinated with the ideal
that somewhere, something we humans had made was doing science we couldn’t do
ourselves. As I traced my fingers along the a map of our solar system with
Voyager’s trajectory overlaid, so I hope will my cousin will someday have a map
of Mars along which to trace a similar path.
Curiosity is inspirational. Now, I don’t need an inspiration
to spur me towards science, having found my own way, but the awe Curiosity
inspires might lead many children to follow it into a field of science.
There is also something else that I have realized in the ten
years since I wrote that sad article about Challenger. There can be no progress
without risk. Those imperfections that manifest as disaster are not failure,
but merely poorly aimed steps forward.
i think space missions were, at the beginning, primarily to inspire people. our ability to influence and explore something so distance is still amazing. science is inspring! and yeah... i think the disasters/poorly aimed steps are primarily a result of failing to pre-empt potential problems.
ReplyDelete